Analysis of an Ethical Dilemma essay

HomeFree EssaysPhilosophyAnalysis of an Ethical DilemmaBuy Custom Essay
← Spinoza vs. Leibniz on God’s ExistenceEthics and Sports →

Analysis of an Ethical Dilemma. Custom Analysis of an Ethical Dilemma Essay Writing Service || Analysis of an Ethical Dilemma Essay samples, help

Analysis of the Interviews

The two interviews with the doctor and the church minister are both against assisted euthanasia. Assisted euthanasia is the process whereby the medical personnel terminate the life of the patients with the aim of stopping their suffering. Despite the fact that the two interviews are of different religious groups, their stand on euthanasia is similar, since both of them are against the process. The doctor is a Muslim, while L. Fortune is a Christian and a church minister.

According to Dr. Mohtaseb, there is no need of performing assisted euthanasia, since there is always hope that his patients will recover. Dr. Mohtaseb specializes in cancer and blood disorders. He says that they can perform chemotherapy to patients who are in critical conditions, adding that there are medications that are used to ease the pain. Dr. Mohtaseb’s stand emerges from his Islamic teachings, which are against euthanasia. He even starts to quote a verse in the Quran that affirms that Allah gives and takes life.

Similarly, Dr. L. Fortune, who is a church minister, does not believe in assisted euthanasia as well. According to L. Fortune, she understands the pain that patients undergo after a long illnesses and the urge to end their life. Arguably, she says that the Bible is full of quotes against euthanasia, thus, she is against it too. Like Dr. Mohtaseb, she quotes the Bible. Dr. L. Fortune concludes that the Bible holds that there is time for everything and God plans all these. Moreover, she quotes the book of Jeremiah where the Bible states that God knows human beings before they are born and He is the one who knows when one will die.

Similarities and Differences

The main similarity between the four interviews is that all of them understand the suffering that human beings undergo. All four interviewees have undergone either suffering or they are medical experts. Additionally, three of the interviewees have quoted religious books, thus, indicating a strong religious stand against the whole concept of euthanasia.

There is also a difference in the interviews. While the first two interviews may support euthanasia, the last do not support euthanasia at any point. The first and the second interviews  support euthanasia if the patient does not have a chance of surviving, while the last two interviews are fully against euthanasia.


As stated in the Bible and Quran, life is given by God, and only God knows when man will die. Rae affirms that assisted euthanasia is not the right step to take. Patients should receive medical care until their right time of death comes. Additionally, medications that reduce pain suffering are better option than depriving people of their lives.

Analysis of an Ethical Dilemma. Custom Analysis of an Ethical Dilemma Essay Writing Service || Analysis of an Ethical Dilemma Essay samples, help

Order Now
Order nowhesitating

Related essays

  1. Ethics and Sports
  2. Normative Ethics
  3. Spinoza vs. Leibniz on God’s Existence
  4. Engineering ethics on BP oil Spill
Order now