Table of Contents
In this ranging debate, a number of quarters have added their voices into this increasing sea of perspectives, perceptions and opinions. Below, there is information on various opinion sources that will help in shaping a reasoned argument and conclusion on this matter. Included in the sources quoted will be a brief breakdown of their propositions, content and direction taken on this controversial debate.
Examiner.com
A health and fitness article posted on July 14 2011 tilted: "should parents lose custody of their obese children". This article examines Ludwig’s and Murtagh proposal from a number of facets. First, the term losing custody of severely obese kids makes no difference, since the obesity we measure on a BMI index and as long as the BMI is at or beyond 95th percentile, it makes no difference. The article introduces a paradox of a study that has shown that kids in a foster home are likely to gain a lot of weight. Furthermore, the founder of Yale Prevention Center, Dr. Katz argues that there is no evidence that kids improve under foster care. Lastly, the writer argues that the country is not short of options and quotes Mitchell Obama’s campaign against marketing junk food as a revelation to consider other viable and enduring solutions.
Fathers Canada
An article posted on the Fathers Canada for Justice Site on July 1 2011 titled: ‘Expert: Parents should lose custody of obese kids’ David Edwards in this article starts by provoking a thought that Ludwig and Murtagh did not invent this school of thought but only raised their voice among so many similar ones. The writer brings in thoughts of Art Caplan, a Bioethicist that if you want to change one obese kid, you have to change all kids. This is because their obese nature is a result of factors such as advertising that are beyond the parents’ control. BJM and Pediatrics articles support the loss of custody but ethicists Dr. Lainie Ross advises humility and caution in doing it.
Healthland Time
A healthland Magazine issued on July 13 2011 issue 253 titled: should parents lose custody of their extremely obese kids? Bonnie Rochman simply explains the merits of Ludwig’s proposal as a measure of last resort, done only in extreme cases, and not an attack on parents, but a legitimate concern over the child’s health. The magazine article introduces differing views of Michigan University law professor Vivek Sankaran on grounds of the trauma caused. Most notable in this article is the proposal of a change in food culture and not blame parents alone.
Mothers Nature
An article appearing on a mother nature network post by Jenn Savedge titled: Are '50s moms to blame for today's obesity rates? This article is a professional nutritionist’s opinion. Melinda Southern, a fitness expert at the Louisiana State University, argues that indeed mothers are specifically to blame, but their blame is on the fact that America’s obese problem dates back to the 80’s. Mothers of this generation ignored breastfeeding, smoked and spaced pregnancies closely. Her argument is that the focus should be on ensuring that a pregnant mother is optimally healthy.
MSN
News headlined: Who is to blame for the US Obesity epidemic? This news article opens us to the enormity of the obese monster. The article points out that America now has a generation that may live shorter that their parents in projection. Interestingly, Stone tells us of nutritionist who have chosen to take companies that make unhealthy diets to court while arguing that paradoxically we choose what we eat. The article concludes with an enlightening interview with a George Washington University professor John Banzhaf on the merit of suing fast food company MacDonald’s.
ObesityinAmerica.org
This article titled ‘Understanding Obesity’ is a good background informer on the cost that the country has paid in dealing with obesity complications. It outlines the financial statistics and causes of the pandemic in the country. This is resourceful in informing one on what is the enormity of the issue and hence shape the answer to the question whether parents should lose custody of their obese children.
Teacher World
This article titled ‘Obese Cleveland Heights Boy Placed in Foster Care’ was a post on the site on 29 November 2011. The article focuses on a case of an 88-year-old boy from Cleveland Heights, who was taken away from her parents and placed in foster care. Aspects of this case are essential in answering the question whether indeed parents ought to lose custody rights of their obese children. To begin with, the above opinion was from a third party well versed with the parties to the question and a professional capable of giving an enlightened opinion.
Benefit from Our Service: Save 25% Along with the first order offer - 15% discount, you save extra 10% since we provide 300 words/page instead of 275 words/page
The writer argues that while state intervention can be justified under extreme cases, their failure of policy to consider when the situation qualifies as extreme, poses imminent danger. The writer also points out the fact that the boy after the separation, did not improve; however, what was shocking was the pace in which the government moved in to support the foster parents. “The government should have provided the mother with resources as well” (Teacher World p1). Another perspective faulted in this proposal is the manner of the separation; this boy was taken away from school in the absence of the mother. This was a disregard of a parent’s position in her child’s life.
In this ranging debate, a number of quarters have added their voices into this increasing sea of perspectives, perceptions and opinions. Below, there is information on various opinion sources that will help in shaping a reasoned argument and conclusion on this matter. Included in the sources quoted will be a brief breakdown of their propositions, content and direction taken on this controversial debate.
VIP services
extended REVISION from - $2.00
SMS NOTIFICATIONS from - $3.00
Proofread by editor from - $3.99
by Top 30 writers from - $4.80
PDF plagiarism report from - $5.99
VIP Support from - $9.99
PACKAGE from - $23.82
Examiner.com
A health and fitness article posted on July 14 2011 tilted: "should parents lose custody of their obese children". This article examines Ludwig’s and Murtagh proposal from a number of facets. First, the term losing custody of severely obese kids makes no difference, since the obesity we measure on a BMI index and as long as the BMI is at or beyond 95th percentile, it makes no difference. The article introduces a paradox of a study that has shown that kids in a foster home are likely to gain a lot of weight. Furthermore, the founder of Yale Prevention Center, Dr. Katz argues that there is no evidence that kids improve under foster care. Lastly, the writer argues that the country is not short of options and quotes Mitchell Obama’s campaign against marketing junk food as a revelation to consider other viable and enduring solutions.
Fathers Canada
An article posted on the Fathers Canada for Justice Site on July 1 2011 titled: ‘Expert: Parents should lose custody of obese kids’ David Edwards in this article starts by provoking a thought that Ludwig and Murtagh did not invent this school of thought but only raised their voice among so many similar ones. The writer brings in thoughts of Art Caplan, a Bioethicist that if you want to change one obese kid, you have to change all kids. This is because their obese nature is a result of factors such as advertising that are beyond the parents’ control. BJM and Pediatrics articles support the loss of custody but ethicists Dr. Lainie Ross advises humility and caution in doing it.
Top 30 writers
Your order will be assigned to the most experienced writer in the relevant discipline. The highly demanded expert, one of our top-30 writers with the highest rate among the customers
Healthland Time
A healthland Magazine issued on July 13 2011 issue 253 titled: should parents lose custody of their extremely obese kids? Bonnie Rochman simply explains the merits of Ludwig’s proposal as a measure of last resort, done only in extreme cases, and not an attack on parents, but a legitimate concern over the child’s health. The magazine article introduces differing views of Michigan University law professor Vivek Sankaran on grounds of the trauma caused. Most notable in this article is the proposal of a change in food culture and not blame parents alone.
Mothers Nature
An article appearing on a mother nature network post by Jenn Savedge titled: Are '50s moms to blame for today's obesity rates? This article is a professional nutritionist’s opinion. Melinda Southern, a fitness expert at the Louisiana State University, argues that indeed mothers are specifically to blame, but their blame is on the fact that America’s obese problem dates back to the 80’s. Mothers of this generation ignored breastfeeding, smoked and spaced pregnancies closely. Her argument is that the focus should be on ensuring that a pregnant mother is optimally healthy.
VIP support
VIP support ensures that your enquiries will be answered immediately by our Support Team. Extra attention is guaranteed.
MSN
News headlined: Who is to blame for the US Obesity epidemic? This news article opens us to the enormity of the obese monster. The article points out that America now has a generation that may live shorter that their parents in projection. Interestingly, Stone tells us of nutritionist who have chosen to take companies that make unhealthy diets to court while arguing that paradoxically we choose what we eat. The article concludes with an enlightening interview with a George Washington University professor John Banzhaf on the merit of suing fast food company MacDonald’s.
ObesityinAmerica.org
This article titled ‘Understanding Obesity’ is a good background informer on the cost that the country has paid in dealing with obesity complications. It outlines the financial statistics and causes of the pandemic in the country. This is resourceful in informing one on what is the enormity of the issue and hence shape the answer to the question whether parents should lose custody of their obese children.
Teacher World
This article titled ‘Obese Cleveland Heights Boy Placed in Foster Care’ was a post on the site on 29 November 2011. The article focuses on a case of an 88-year-old boy from Cleveland Heights, who was taken away from her parents and placed in foster care. Aspects of this case are essential in answering the question whether indeed parents ought to lose custody rights of their obese children. To begin with, the above opinion was from a third party well versed with the parties to the question and a professional capable of giving an enlightened opinion.
The writer argues that while state intervention can be justified under extreme cases, their failure of policy to consider when the situation qualifies as extreme, poses imminent danger. The writer also points out the fact that the boy after the separation, did not improve; however, what was shocking was the pace in which the government moved in to support the foster parents. “The government should have provided the mother with resources as well” (Teacher World p1). Another perspective faulted in this proposal is the manner of the separation; this boy was taken away from school in the absence of the mother. This was a disregard of a parent’s position in her child’s life.
Related Medicine essays
0
Preparing Orders
0
Active Writers
0%
Positive Feedback
0
Support Agents