The choice of the best weapon to be developed in Kachakistan depends on the country’s resources and technological competency. This will ensure that the developed weapons will have the desired impact and will meet Kachakistan’s strategic goals. All things considered, it is critical to assess the advantages and disadvantages of chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear weapons.
Chemical weapons do not incur significantly heavy developmental costs like other weapons of mass destruction, since they are easily manufactured and transported. Consequently, the deployment of chemical weapons leads to the absolute destruction of the target, killing the enemy and destroying their ecosystem. However, while chemical weapons are cheap, they have significant drawbacks. Chemical weapons destroy everything they come into contact with, without conscientious selection of enemy, friend or innocent bystander (Croddy & Wirtz, 2005). Misplacement or theft of chemical weapons is very conceivable, hence they might fall into the wrong hands. Additionally, the usage of chemical weapons, leads to degradation of the environment, since they do not decompose for exceedingly long periods. Chemical weapons can be used strategically as leverage in instances where a country is threatened by another one, or in reclaiming lost territories in past conflicts with other countries.
Just like chemical weapons, biological weapons result in an extensive and rapid death of the potential targets. As a result, when used in warfare, they act as an effective means of disseminating the enemy, reducing its population significantly. Biological weapons have detrimental impacts to the exposed population, even if the exposure is mild. The effects of biological weapons affect future generations of the targeted population. Survivors of a biological attack suffer serious deformities in their physiology and mental health leading to a disabled populace (Curley, 2011). However, despite the potential benefits of biological weapons when used against an enemy, the fallout of their use cannot be reliably constrained to the targeted population. Therefore, there is a high probability for the citizens of Kachakistan to become victims of their own weapons. Biological weapons can be used strategically where the enemy has a competitive advantage in terms of armament and human resources..
Radiological weapons have an impact that causes significant environmental degradation and numerous deaths of human, animal and plant life in the target area. The advantage of using radiological weapons is rendering the affected areas to be toxic for human habitation for extremely long periods. Additionally, when the enemy is within the proximity of the radiological weapon’s fallout area, it is affected by such diseases as cancer and radiation poisoning (Croddy & Wirtz, 2005). Therefore, radiological weapons render significant areas to be inhabitable, destroying property and infrastructure. The prospect of using a radiological weapon against the enemy creates fear and panic. Disrupting the enemy consequently creates a competitive advantage against them accordingly. However, the impacts of radiological weapons may result in radiation fallout within the country, especially if a proper handling and storage are not implemented. Radiological weapons are costly since the raw materials are not available promptly. They can be used strategically to radiate critical regions such as airports, poison enemy soldiers or to cause panic among civilians in the enemy territories (Curley, 2011).
Nuclear weapons constitute the most destructive weapon, which in turn considers a sign of power over the enemy who may not have such armament. As a result, nuclear weapons are advantageous in the power they bestow to the country. Besides the power over others, the possession of such weapon provides a sense of security and averts future threats against the country. However, while the development of nuclear weapons may give the country a weighty competitive advantage, it is expensive to develop and maintain the efficient nuclear weapons program. Meanwhile, in the event of nuclear mishaps, the fallout can lead to significant losses in human, environmental and economic terms. The destructive nature of nuclear weapons has global impacts; therefore, their use affects not only the enemy territories, but also other countries including the one in which the weapon was deployed (Croddy & Wirtz, 2005). Nuclear weapons can be used strategically as a deterrent against external aggression. The information about the possession of nuclear weapons by a country, would deter any external aggression by the potential enemy state..
The recommended weapon to be developed by Kachakistan is the nuclear weapon. The latter is less likely to be used against an enemy and the intelligence about its possession is enough to avert any enemy from attacking. Meanwhile, the use of chemical, biological and radiological weapons have significant social-economic and political ramifications, where the country may be subjected to political and economic sanctions, or it may be ousted by the international bodies such as United Nations.