The Journal of John Woolman basically portrayed the tough Quaker beliefs and convictions Woolman had towards the acts of slavery as well as other contentious issues which affected the American people during the 17th century like slave trade, conscription, oppression, economic injustices, and also cruelty towards animals. His philosophical charisma facilitated in opening the gateways for the establishment of civil rights lobby groups. In his journal, he employs a plain style of writing where he narrated clearly the social matters which affected the American community under the hands of colonialists and he wrote in profundity about war and slavery because he significantly opposed them. He actually stressed the suggestion that every person was equal. After analyzing his journal, it’s vivid that his conscience and religion were imperative manipulations on his personal beliefs toward the social controversial issues (Journal of John Woolman, n.p.).
The humble background of Woolman whereby he was brought up in a Quaker community influenced him a lot towards voicing the social problems affecting the people. The Quakers deem in existing in a simplistic way of life and through his numerous experiences and occupations he was able to directly lay down plainly all the issues that affected the Americans at that time.
The New England writers possessed a unique quality in that they all had strong shared beliefs however they chose different parameters to disclose them to the public. John Woolman and Anne Bradstreet were such writers and both of them had compelling beliefs in the supreme God nevertheless they both didn’t actually have similar preaching techniques. The writer Bradstreet usually wanted to distribute her adoration of God all through her work of poetry while Woolman seemingly shared his ideas and adoration by way of mouth. Their auspicious diverse religious backgrounds participated in the way they carried themselves and also how they reasoned and perceived the community. Bradstreet who was a Puritan, centered much of her writings on wholly her home life, and highly tried to dispel the issue of material things and this was also featured in Woolman who by being a Quaker was less concerned regarding to material possessions. Therefore the two writers have had quite a massive impact on the communities of their time and also to the present generations due to their desire for God’s recognition.
Bradstreet on her part wrote with lots of force and simplicity just as Woolman did and nonetheless her activities were termed as uncommon during her time especially since she was a woman. She actually wanted the women of her time to be credited by the general public for not only being mothers and house workers but also for other activities and occupations the women were doing. The puritan society seemingly didn’t approve of the deeds of other women, for instance, they frowned due to Bradstreet’s writing ventures as they saw it as an inappropriate behavior from her. How other women in the community infuriated her that’s why she is seen plainly to disregard how the male dominance perceived them and yet the women were more educated in diverse activities apart from household chores (Bradstreet, pp 98).
John Woolman championed for the abolishment of slavery and also slave trade through his lifelong testimonies which were compiled in his journal. He plainly described how slave trade and slavery were against the Christianity religion and even went further to show how he was intensely afflicted by the predominance of slavery in several states he visited like North Carolina, Virginia, and Maryland. The straightforwardness and preciseness of his writings are evident throughout his journal and its clear that he reported events as they were, for instance, where he travels to the southern part of America, he was obliged to interact with plantation farmers who hold slaves and saw how they entertained their guests at the expense of the slaves. Therefore due to his honesty he turned down the free offers of the planters as he saw it as torture to humanity (VIII. 1761, 1762. John Woolman, n.p.).
On the other hand, William Bradford was more concerned with the nature’s part in people’s lives and especially Christians. He actually perceived nature to be a muddled wilderness which was controlled by Satan’s meddling. He had beliefs that even though Satan was responsible for sowing wonderful dissensions, heresies, and errours, he was also the architect behind disorder and confusion in the whole natural world. For this reason, he saw the American country as an inhospitable wasteland, and a manifestation of the religious chaos in the nation. Bradford clearly describes the activities which roamed the world and specifically America and he sees nature as the fallen world which lacked stability and order was threatening and also representing the contamination gotten from sin (Bradford, pp 71).
The plain style of writing and narrating used by the three writers namely, William Bradford, Anne Bradstreet, and John Woolman clearly reflects how they had shared values towards humanity and natural in general. For instance, Bradstreet clearly showed how she detested the way other people treated women as they presumed them to be only house workers and she tried showing the whole community how even women were able to follow occupations like writing activities. Woolman who was a major campaigner towards the abolition of slavery as well as slave trade had a soft spot for slaves and followed his religious beliefs to argue out how every human being was similar to the other and therefore the planters ought to release all the slaves they owned. Similarly, Bradford criticized the world and terms it as fallen due to the impending sins and activities which had made America to be inhospitable. Therefore, the three writers use the plain writing technique to expound on their shared values of nature and humanity.