Free Custom «Rhetorical Analysis of Levin`s audience» Essay Paper

Question: Basing your answer solely on what glean through reading the text, list 1 assumption you can make about Levin’s audience

1-American educated conservatives

How do you know: the writer suggests that Pinker’s essay is an example of a set of attitudes toward religion and supports foreign practices which undermine the societal norms which depicts that he is addressing conservative audience.

Example: Levin, (2008) highlights that, “Pinker’s essay is a striking exhibit of a set of attitudes toward religion and the West’s moral tradition that has become surprisingly common among America’s intellectual elite. It is a mix of fear, suspicion, and disgust that has a lot to do, for instance, with the Left’s intense paranoia about the Bush administration, and with the peculiar notion that American conservatives have declared a war on science; and it involves more generally an inclination to reject any idea drawn in any way from a religiously inspired tradition which unfortunately includes just about everything in the humanities (p.71)”

 

Type of service

Type of assignment

Title of your paper *

Academic level

Pages

Timeframe

Spacing

Currency

  Order now

Analysis: Levin describes Pinker as a crusader of new and foreign societal norms which undermines American traditional human dignity. In addition, the authors is suppressed that pinker discredit the work of the council as an orchestration of the work of  religious entities who would like to further their hidden agenda on Americans and since Levin was the director of the council then he is part of the group  Pinker talks about.

The author choose to critique and discredit Pinker argument so that he can  appeal to the audience to embrace dignity of bioethics and  not to bow to foreign norms  adopted to allow what he call indignity in bioethics. The effect of doing a critique on Pinker work convinces the audience since there are educated conservative.

Paragraph:

The writer suggests that Pinker’s essay is an example of a set of attitudes toward religion and promotes foreign practices which depicts that he is addressing conservative audience. Towards this, Levin describes Pinker as a crusader of new and foreign societal norms which undermines American traditional human dignity. In addition, the authors is suppressed that pinker discredit the work of the council as an orchestration of the work of  religious entities who would like to further their hidden agenda on Americans and since Levin was the director of the council then he is part of the group  Pinker talks about. Levin, (2008) highlights that, “Pinker’s essay is a striking exhibit of a set of attitudes toward religion and the West’s moral tradition that has become surprisingly common among America’s intellectual elite. It is a mix of fear, suspicion, and disgust that has a lot to do, for instance, with the Left’s intense paranoia about the Bush administration, and with the peculiar notion that American conservatives have declared a war on science; and it involves more generally an inclination to reject any idea drawn in any way from a religiously inspired tradition which unfortunately includes just about everything in the humanities (p.71)”