In the contemporary organizational setting, the behaviors of leaders and managers play a significant role in influencing the efficiency with which organizational operations are executed. The role of guiding and ensuring that organizational practices are in line with the desired variables are being achieved primarily lies with the leader of the specific organization. In essence, their managerial role occurs on a wider scale in comparison to that of contemporary managers.
In essence, leaders are the best part of managers courtesy of their people-oriented approach in executing their individual managerial roles. One of the critical factors leading to the preference of leaders as better managers comes from the sense that leaders are in a better position to communicate their desired vision in the best form of a mission statement. “Effective leaders ensure that people understand and are committed to vision through-out the organization” (Gill, 2006). This therefore puts them at a vantage position of better communicating goals making them people oriented personnel. Furthermore, “communicating a vision in a confident and attractive way and taking overt action to implement and pursue the vision are two core components that are common across current leadership theories” (Gill, 2006).
Elements of leadership style
Some of the key elements critical in developing an admirable leadership style include communication, social facilitation abilities, and problem solving approaches. These are very critical especially in a managerial setting in which managers are essentially expected to guide organizational inputs to produce the desired outputs. “Solving problems effectively and making great decisions are at the heart of leadership. Effective leaders, like professionals and trades people, have a full tool kit of leadership tools…are the problem solving and decision making tools…” (Hiebert & Klatt, 2001). This forms the core of great leadership for the individual pursuing the people oriented mindset. In addition, social facilitation abilities enable a formidable leader to handle people from diverse social background while focusing on the contextual realities. For instance, apprehension and evaluation theorists have primarily focused upon motivational factors from people who are motivated to enhance a positive impression of others using this approach (Goethals & Sorenson, 2006).
Organizational Conditions Function as Substitutes for Leadership
There exist critical organizational conditions that influence the manner in which leadership fundamentals progress even in the potential absence of the necessary leadership. An example of such a condition is when an organization has adopted a cultural formula of operation that is synonymous with the leadership responsible for promoting the culture. In such a situation, personnel in an organizational setting are bound to continue operating even without significant supervision through delegation of roles by the assigned leadership.
Behavioral Effects of Leadership Based Resulting from
The attitudes and behavior resulting from lower levels of an organizational setting can significantly affect the manner in which the leadership implements certain critical decisions. Majority of the times, the leaders will tend to formulate certain strategies aimed at delineating them from playing critical decision roles in the organization. “Alternatively, the distraction-conflict theorists proposed that the presence of others produces an attentional conflict in which individuals are torn between playing attention to the audience or the task” (Goethals & Sorenson, 2006).
Impact of Leadership Succession
Consider a scenario where a leader decides to delegate his leadership role to a preferred successor in order to ensure his incomplete vision reaches a successful end. In this case, no consultation has been made with other organizational members in order to get the necessary approval. In such a case, opposition might interfere with the next leader’s efforts of making any progress. Using the stated theory as a guide through people oriented approach such kind of instances can be avoided since other organization personnel are in a position of giving their views and propose their preferences.