In the process of evaluating the safe and viable option for the project, several aspects of the project must be considered. The direct and indirect effects the project has on its stakeholders need to be evaluated. The environmental agencies and peer groups response towards the projects implementation should be assessed and responded to with respect to the projects sensitivity. Government agencies’ response to the project’s compliance with stipulated rules and regulations is significant in the evaluation of available options.
The project’s planning managers and organizing committee should consider the existing constraints on the implementation of a carbon tetrachloride project. The constraints can be categorized as regulatory, environmental, health, and financial. It is essential to conduct a thorough cost benefit analysis to ascertain the project’s viability. The involvement of other agencies and their contributions to the project’s successful implementation should not be ignored (ATDSR, 2005).
The risks involved with the project’s implementation are significant in deciding on the best option for the project. Carbon tetrachloride is highly toxic and detrimental to both human health and environment. The ability of the project to satisfy the guidelines and policies stipulated by the Environmental Protection Agency (ITRC, 2002) while observing stipulated standards in application of carbon tetrachloride is critical. The observation of healthy working conditions while limiting the amounts of exposure is essential to the project (Habek, 2010). However, given carbon tetrachloride’s assimilation attributes, it is difficult to quantify the extent of exposure.
The difficulty associated with measuring the extent of carbon tetrachloride’s exposure levels results in inadequate estimation of the expected fallout. These may vary from serious chronic effects to minor health effects (ATDSR, 2005). The difficulty of detecting problems with the project is a contributing factor in the consideration of other options available for the project. The dangers posed by problems of identification, measurement, and control of carbon tetrachloride’s exposure necessitate the consideration of other options (ITRC 2002).
While considering the health and ecological effects of implementing carbon tetrachloride in the project, the effective option is abandonment of carbon tetrachloride as a key ingredient of the project. If this is not possible, then the project as a whole should be abandoned. The consideration of this option culminates from the problems associated with its implementation. Carbon tetrachloride’s high toxicity levels have been characterized as dangerous to human and environmental health (CDC, 2002). This aspect of carbon tetrachloride has led to the abolishment of its uses in industrial and domestic applications in various countries across the world. The implementation of such a decision has been inspired by the adverse effects resulting from the use of carbon tetrachloride.
Preservation and maintenance of human health should be a priority of any project. Therefore, the parameters and constraints in measuring the danger posed by implementation of carbon tetrachloride are numerous. The control environment for the project cannot be guaranteed to be safe for human operations. It is critical that the human safety is assured and effective measurable controls are implemented. However, a project involving carbon tetrachloride has difficulties of assessing the risks involved and quantifying the risk environment. The chemical, physical, and biological parameters of the project cannot be defined definitively (CDC, 2002).
Available options for the projects are essential in the event that the project’s problems outweigh the benefits. In this case, the ecological effects of carbon tetrachloride would lead to the deaths of significant ecosystems that are essential in environmental sustainability. These will affect human health and life adversely. The gaseous attributes of carbon tetrachloride have contributed to the green house effect in alteration of global weather patterns while depleting the ozone layer (EPA, 2007).
It is critical to consider the attributes of carbon tetrachloride. Its chemical, physical, and biological implications for human health and overall environmental hazards posed. In lieu of these facts, the response of the project stakeholders concerns while considering the needs and requirements of each. The difficulty involved in the identification of the risks posed due to carbon tetrachloride’s use necessitates the consideration of an alternative. Abandoning carbon tetrachloride is the safest and the least costly option available for the project. The project should consider another less harmful and unconstructed ingredient for the project.