Sales: Sales: Support: Support:
Academic writing services  
 
Custom written essay Book report Research paper Dissertation Resume and CV Editing and proofreading  
main menu
discounts
discounts
By ordering custom paper you get
  • 24/7 Support
  • Over 100 professional US Writers
  • 300 words per page
  • Flexible discount system
  • FREE revision (within 2 days)
  • Anti-Plagiarism Software Check
we accept
sample essays
Accounting Essays
Admission Essays
Analysis Essays
Art Essays
Biography Essays
Biology Essays
Book Review Essays
Business Essays
Case Studies Essays
Cause and Effect Essays
Character Analysis Essays
Communication Essays
Communication and Media Essays
Compute Technologies Essays
Consideration Essays
Controversial Essays
Description Essays
Economics Essays
Education Essays
Evaluation Essays
Explanation Essays
History Essays
Job Essays
Law Essays
Management Essays
Medicine Essays
Music Essays
Personal Essays
Personal Experience Essays
Persuasive Essays
Persuasive Speech Essays
Philosophy Essays
Political science Essays
Politics Essays
Proposal Essays
Psychology Essays
Reflective Essays
Religion Essays
Research Essays
Response Essays
School Essays
Science Essays
Sociology Essays
Technology Essays
World Literature Essays
Argument Essays essay
 
← Map of Ethical DilemmasPorter and Kramer →

Argument Essays. Custom Argument Essays Essay Writing Service || Argument Essays Essay samples, help

In 1953, the state of California passed a law that allowed ‘un-emancipated’ minors to receive an abortion. Since then social conservatives and state agents have made several attempts to amend this law on the basis that parental involvement is critical in such an important decision. In 1987, the State Legislature added a clause requiring that minors obtain parental or legal consent prior to an abortion procedure (San Francisco Chronicle, 17). The amendment was challenged in court and thus never enforced. In 2005, supporters of parental notification tried to use the ballot to pass Proposition 73. This proposition would have established a 48 hour mandatory pre-abortion waiting period during which, parents would be served with written notification of the intent (Proposition 4). It failed. In 2008, supporters of parental notification qualified Proposition 4. The difference between Proposition 4 and previous amendments was that it allowed notification of parental substitutes in cases, where the minor feared retribution or abuse. The parent substitute would be a person, who was at least twenty one years of age, who is a grandparent, stepparent, foster parent, aunt, uncle, sibling, half sibling or cousin to the minor. The parent or parent substitute could also give a written waiver of the notice based on clear and convincing evidence of the minor’s best interests or maturity (Department of Health Services). In the November 4, 2008 ballot in California, Proposition 4 was defeated.

In their article Yes: it provides protection for children. Francis and Francis argue that pre-abortion parental notification is only common sense. Allowing minors, who are already vulnerable members of the community, to handle pregnancy alone is both socially and medically negligent. They assert that parents or pseudo-parental figures are essential to the process, if the state expects accurate medical records that will be provided and that the minor will receive comprehensive and appropriate post-abortion care. In the rare instances, where minors face threat of abuse or violence at home, the proposition allows for the notification of alternative family members or the acquisition of a judicial waiver. Where pregnancy was a direct result of sexual abuse or coercion, the proposition makes it much easier to report or discover will sexual predators and prosecute repeat offenders. Proposition 4 is essential in assuring teenage health and safety (Francis and Francis).

Having an abortion is an adult decision that requires adult guidance. States that have institutionalized family involvement have lower rates of teen pregnancies, abortions and sexually transmitted infections (Francis and Francis). In California, minors are required to obtain parental consent before undergoing even small beauty or surgical procedures. Abortion should be no different, especially, considering that it has the potential to influence the minor’s life-path. The family, as the core unit of society, provides the emotional and counseling foundation that these teenagers require, when making such life altering decisions (Department of Health Services). When a parent or a parent substitute is notified, the minor, is also receiving an additional resource through their decision making and recovery process. Family will provide guidance in option selection, competent health care and an environment that is conducive for the minor to work through the issues that preceded the unplanned pregnancy.

Bellasalma counters Francis and Francis argument by noting that Proposition 4 has more of a potential for harm rather than protecting them. In her article, she emphasizes that though proponents assert that its intention is to secure the health of minors, the reality is that the proposition will limit minors’ access to healthcare by insisting on the 48 hour parental notification period. The fact that medical personnel that aid these desperate minors work under the threat of prosecution, is just another strike against the proposition. Though Proposition 4 relies heavily on parental notification, the kind of notification required is superficial at best. A form letter is sent to a parent or relative. The state does not require or request the receiver to provide post-abortion assistance to the minor. Contrary to Francis and Francis, she insists that threats and cases of parental abuse and violence are not that rare, if a minor is found to be pregnant, some forms of which are not even criminalized. If States that have institutionalized parental notification are anything to go by, such stringent conditions only encourage the minors to delay medical care and counseling or seek life-threatening alternatives  like self-induced or illegal abortions.

Notification should be a choice not a requirement. Bellasalma notes that already a majority of teenagers with unplanned pregnancies alert their parents prior to making the decision to abort. She asserts that Proposition 4 is another ploy by pro-life institutions and individuals to limit access to abortion for women. She reiterates that unlike those other states, California does not need Proposition 4. Even without it, the state has managed to reduce pregnancy rates by over 40%. Moreover states, that have enforced parental notification, have reported higher rates of self induced and illegal abortions (Bellasalma). Placing barriers to minors already traumatized by their situation is not solving the problem of unplanned pregnancies. Proponents should focus on institutionalizing preventative measures, such as contraception and exhaustive sex education.

Both the proponents and opponents to Proposition 4 have valid arguments. Indeed, abortion is a life-altering decision that requires considerable thought and a deliberate investigation and consideration of other options. However, the proposition is tantamount to enforced privacy violation. Teenagers are at an age, where they are most conscious and concerned about the issue of their privacy. The proposition increases the chances of deviancy, especially in cases, where the minor fears retaliation due to the unplanned pregnancy.  In cases, where a minor from an abusive home is willing to follow the law, there is the distinct possibility of retaliation from irate family members (San Francisco Chronicle, 17). She may be thrown out or beaten leading to her reporting the incident to either Law Enforcement or Child Protective Services.  An investigation would ensue, the state may prosecute. In the meantime the minor is still left with the burden of an unplanned pregnancy and dealing with the ramifications of the emotional and legal strife of a broken home. To the minor, the alternative of an unsafe abortion attempt may very well seem like the better, less cumbersome option. For the sake of these, not so few minors, Proposition 4 would have been a life sentence. 

Argument Essays. Custom Argument Essays Essay Writing Service || Argument Essays Essay samples, help

Order Now
Order nowhesitating

Related essays

  1. Porter and Kramer
  2. Old System of Short-Term Targets
  3. Map of Ethical Dilemmas
  4. Ethics and Public Administration


order now

 
 
3.6K
1.2K
Order now
Email
Password
 
why choose us
96% of satisfied returning customers
24/7 customer support
A wide range of services
Up-to-date sources
100% privacy guaranteed
MA/PhD writers
Custom written papers only
Free plagiarism report
Free revision (within 2 days)
Free extras by your request
Direct communication with a writer
faq
Are your writers qualified for the custom writing?
How quick can my order be accomplished?
Is it legal to buy custom essays, term papers or book reports from your company?
Are essays offered by your company truly custom-written?
Is it safe to buy from SupremeEssays.com?
How secure is the payment system of your company?
Can I submit custom essays or term papers done by your company as my own?
How can I contact your company if I've got problems with my ordered paper?
testimonials

Finally, I've found the real custom writing service . My grades are saying "Thank you, it's been a pleasure to work with you."

Jamal, South Africa

I can't believe you finished my essay under such a short deadline! You saved me from a disaster once again. You guys deliver exactly what you promise. I'll be back. That's for sure!

William H , Kansas, US

contact us
Toll free for US & Canada only. International callers are charged for outgoing calls.

Our phone numbers:
SupremeEssays.com provides custom term paper writing/rewriting services inclusive of research material for assistance purposes only. The term papers should be used with proper reference and are not meant to replace actual assignments.
 

Get 15% off your first custom essay order

Order now

PRICES
from $12.99/PAGE

X