Sales: Sales: Support: Support:
Academic writing services  
 
Custom written essay Book report Research paper Dissertation Resume and CV Editing and proofreading  
main menu
discounts
discounts
By ordering custom paper you get
  • 24/7 Support
  • Over 100 professional US Writers
  • 300 words per page
  • Flexible discount system
  • FREE revision (within 2 days)
  • Anti-Plagiarism Software Check
we accept
sample essays
Accounting Essays
Admission Essays
Analysis Essays
Art Essays
Biography Essays
Biology Essays
Book Review Essays
Business Essays
Case Studies Essays
Cause and Effect Essays
Character Analysis Essays
Communication Essays
Communication and Media Essays
Compute Technologies Essays
Consideration Essays
Controversial Essays
Description Essays
Economics Essays
Education Essays
Evaluation Essays
Explanation Essays
History Essays
Job Essays
Law Essays
Management Essays
Medicine Essays
Music Essays
Personal Essays
Personal Experience Essays
Persuasive Essays
Persuasive Speech Essays
Philosophy Essays
Political science Essays
Politics Essays
Proposal Essays
Psychology Essays
Reflective Essays
Religion Essays
Research Essays
Response Essays
School Essays
Science Essays
Sociology Essays
Technology Essays
World Literature Essays
Censorship in the Classroom essay
 
← Same-Sex Marriages in the USCapital Punishment →

Censorship in the Classroom. Custom Censorship in the Classroom Essay Writing Service || Censorship in the Classroom Essay samples, help

In simple terms censorship in the classroom could be defined as Banning of Books or other learning materials from the Classroom. Censorship is "the removal, suppression, or restricted circulation of literary, artistic or educational materials ... on the grounds that these are morally or otherwise objectionable in light of the standards applied by the censor," (Mikulecky, 1981). In accordance to this definitions and other similar definitions, it could be observed that, various decisions made by school boards over what should be taught in schools might be classified as operations of censorship. Challenges to school materials are a widespread occurrence. What is the way of handling such challenges? How can they be shunned? What manuscripts should be taught in schools? It sounds like a straightforward question but the response can be multifarious (Mikulecky, 1981).

Challenges to curriculum materials have torn apart societies. On the one hand, those who support the banning of particular books argue that children in grades K-12 will be exposed to harm if they are not protected from unsuitable materials. Opponents of this idea are with the same force arguing that censorship of books and other curriculum content is a violation of the academic freedom and multiplicity of thought protected by various laws.

Some of the classic works that have been banned fr4om schools over the recent years have been Nathaniel Hawthorne's Scarlet Letter, Shakespeare's Hamlet, and Mark Twain's The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn. According to the American Civil Liberties Union report, most frequently banned or challenged books of recent times are listed as Catcher in the Rye by J. D. Salinger, R. L. Stine's Goosebumps series and I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings by Maya Angelou. An account by the National School Boards Association (NSBA) states that censorship of school materials is widespread throughout the United States. Those challenges commonly work; almost one-third lead to materials being removed from schools or their use cut.

Challenges to resources in school curriculum, as described in the Henry Reichmann's Censorship and Selection, Issues and Answers for Schools, commonly arise in these areas:

  • sex and drug education
  • teaching evolution with no reference to creationism
  • literature showing children challenging parents and powers that be
  • showing women conduct themselves in nontraditional ways
  • "Invasions of privacy" -- projects that require students to distribute personal information.

Various court cases that have de alt with censorship issues show a broad tendency toward supporting the schools, but they also caution the educators to be aware of values, that comprise of the minority values, in the societies that they serve. Experts have referred to the First Amendment of the Constitution as defending both students' rights to knowledge and the teachers' rights to academic autonomy. At the same time, legal experts make an argument that it is the right of the parents to disapprove books or materials that they think are damaging to their children (Terry II, 1986).

In a milestone censorship case, Island Trees Union Free High School v. Pico (1982), the Court asserted that the "Constitution does not permit the official suppression of ideas," (Terry II, 1986) and the banned books were brought back to school. In this and many other cases, the Court looks as if to allow school boards a relatively free hand with core curriculum materials. In another case, the Pico case, Justice Brennan's plurality opinion argued that a foundation for deciding censorship conflicts over school materials could rest upon the use of "established unbiased procedures for the review of controversial materials" (Terry II, 1986) at the local community level  (Terry II, 1986).

To avoid much controversy over censorship in the classroom, school boards necessitate clearly stated guidelines outlining how materials are selected. Selection guidelines should put into consideration the viewpoints of a variety of groups in the community and be put into practice by professionals. Those coming up with various guidelines should put into consideration parental and community concerns and demonstrate the acceptance of the national diversity. If selection guiding principle ignores rights of the minority, censorship questions may come up. And school resources should not be preferred for partisan political rationale.

To come up with a community compromise and avoid cries for censorship, Larry several strategies are recommended (Mikulecky, 1981):

  • Ask parents to make contributions in developing school reading programs.
  • Present recommended, instead of required, reading lists.
  • Have files of professional reviews that support materials.
  • Put off the perception that only one text can be used to teach a particular theme.
  • In communal bargaining agreements, negotiate articles that defend academic freedom and advocate for agreed-on selection processes.

When controversy over censorship in the classroom flares up in spite of efforts to stay away from it, there are various ways of managing it to reduce damage. "good internal communications and public relations offer the best way to avoid unnecessary controversy" (Chion-Kenney, 1989). Some professionals have recommended the following procedure, says (Chion-Kenney, 1989):

  • Get together with the complainant and endeavor to come up with a resolution on the issue.
  • If that does snot work, ask for a written complaint with details of the questionable material, the effect it is considered to have on students, and what substitute material is suggested.
  • Provide the complainant with a copy of published guidelines for contentious materials and give explanation on the process to be followed.
  • Have a review committee to table a final report with the school board.
  • Notify the complainant of the assessment process and when committee meetings are scheduled.
  • Provide an appeals procedure.
  • As the complaint is being explored, avail the contentious material, apart from possibly to the scholar whose family has filed a dispute.

School boards are lawfully accountable for what is taught in schools, according to general laws. It is the board that delegate powers to school officials and therefore it is held accountable for school policies.

In summing up, the NSBA report affirms that "the challenge is not to avoid censorship, but to meet it head on with adequate policies and procedures that provide an open forum for deciding what should -- or should not -- take place in public schools" (Reichmann, 1988).

Censorship in the Classroom. Custom Censorship in the Classroom Essay Writing Service || Censorship in the Classroom Essay samples, help

Order Now
Order nowhesitating

Related essays

  1. Capital Punishment
  2. Gay Marriages
  3. Same-Sex Marriages in the US
  4. Technology and Privacy


order now

 
 
3.6K
1.2K
Order now
Email
Password
 
why choose us
96% of satisfied returning customers
24/7 customer support
A wide range of services
Up-to-date sources
100% privacy guaranteed
MA/PhD writers
Custom written papers only
Free plagiarism report
Free revision (within 2 days)
Free extras by your request
Direct communication with a writer
faq
Are your writers qualified for the custom writing?
How quick can my order be accomplished?
Is it legal to buy custom essays, term papers or book reports from your company?
Are essays offered by your company truly custom-written?
Is it safe to buy from SupremeEssays.com?
How secure is the payment system of your company?
Can I submit custom essays or term papers done by your company as my own?
How can I contact your company if I've got problems with my ordered paper?
testimonials

Finally, I've found the real custom writing service . My grades are saying "Thank you, it's been a pleasure to work with you."

Jamal, South Africa

I can't believe you finished my essay under such a short deadline! You saved me from a disaster once again. You guys deliver exactly what you promise. I'll be back. That's for sure!

William H , Kansas, US

contact us
Toll free for US & Canada only. International callers are charged for outgoing calls.

Our phone numbers:
SupremeEssays.com provides custom term paper writing/rewriting services inclusive of research material for assistance purposes only. The term papers should be used with proper reference and are not meant to replace actual assignments.
 

Get 15% off your first custom essay order

Order now

PRICES
from $12.99/PAGE

X