Departed are the days when smoking was well thought-out as a stylish as well as a determiner of superiority. Currently, the peril associated with the act of smoking in addition to the second hand smoke is everyday in the news and healthiness associated information. Despite the fact that smokers retain that it is their individual right and choice to smoke, others declare that they should try and grasp the look in the bigger picture. In my view, the act of smoking should not be permitted anywhere near office building or even public considering the dangers associated with second-hand smoke along with the general sanitation of office buildings. First of all, second-hand smoke is precarious to equally non-smokers as well as smokers.In addition, scientific research has revealed that the habit of smoking is associated with augmented risks of cancer as well as other related diseases. Nevertheless, inhaled second-hand smoke is in reality more hazardous than smoking itself. Taking into consideration the human rights of others, this is a subject that can no longer be well thought-out a matter as a personal choice. On the condition that the second-hand smoke is putting the live of people for instance children and pregnant women in danger, thus all non-smokers should be provided with the necessary protection from preventable health risks. Given the reason that all smokers have admittance to private places and places that won't endanger the welfare of other individuals, then the ban of smoking in public places will be advantageous (Tobin, 2006, pp.41).In addition, ashes, cigarette butts as well as cigarette smoke have been associated with ruining the ocular appeal of an office, public place or any other building. The numerous widespread aspects of smoking are characterised by, littered cigarette butts as well as walls that are stained yellow. Alongside this mess, there is in addition a terrible unpleasant smell that holds on to the whole lot, as well as people. In favour of a non-smoker this is an act that can make an excellent job look awful. Workers interviewed usually declare that the stench and untidiness associated with smoking areas turn their place of work awkward and unpleasant. This ineptness transforms into lost competence as well as amplified inefficiency. Therefore it is the sole responsibility of Businesses and managers to enforce a ban on smoking in office building to guarantee optimal employee performance.
Many studies, surveys as well as scientific research have been carried out and the results have indicated that smoking is detrimental to health. In addition the habit of smoking is suffocating and unhealthy, and it simply act to pollute the environment. In practice, there exist two types of smokers - that is the passive and active smokers. The individual who smokes is the active one while the one near him and who inhales the smoke is referred to as the passive smoker. Both of the individuals are prone to the ill effects associated with smoking. Smokers as well as non smokers intermingle in different public places such as buses, offices and hotels. Thus in consideration of the negative effects of smoking on a person's health, rights in addition to the environment, smoking ought to be banned in all public places. It should be quite clear that a person who wants to smoke can thus do so in isolation (Frohlich, 2008, pp.880).Cigarette smoking has always been glamorized through advertisements leading to more young girls and boys being fascinated by the act. Although there exists 'statutory warnings' on the cigarette packets, this is not enough to stop them from engaging in fatal smoking habit. The youthful generation have grown to associate those individuals who smoke as being modern, smart and intellectuals. However, the habit of smoking is not as glamorous as it is made to appear. Instead, the practise is associated with several health problems with the chain smoker being the worst of the sufferers (Journal of Clinical Investigation, 2008, pp.128).
Cigarette alone contains more than 4,000 different chemicals and out of which 43 are capable of causing cancer. On the other hand, the carbon monoxide contained in the smoke is greater than 20,000 ppm which during inhalation is diluted to 400-500. The carbon monoxide takes the place of oxygen in the blood thus resulting to an impaired central nervous system, pulmonary as well as heart diseases. In addition cigarettes contain certain chemicals that can trigger asthmatic effects and which include ammonia and other hydrocarbons. The dust particles present in cigarettes as well as the nicotine are liable to cause cancer, irritation to the eyes, addiction as well as emphysema (Obesity, Fitness & Wellness Week, 2010, pp.215).For that reason, considering all the consequences of smoking, the Government's strategy to ban smoking in communal places is reasonable. However, such an action of enforcing a full ban on smoking does not come cheap. The banning may cause an economic alarm to the government. Such a regulation will lead to reduced sales on cigarettes and the government is bound to lose millions initially realized inform of excise duties. The whole of tobacco industry will come to a standstill and millions of people will lose their employment.According to Menke (2009), if a government is concerned about the health of its citizens, then it should look beyond and above the economic contemplation and unearth a way to end this. So, the government should take the first initiative to enforce a no smoking policy on all public places. For instance, the Indian government has by now put into place this rule in several parts of the state. The policy directs that children below the age of 18 years should not allowed to work in tobacco industries or be allowed to sell tobacco for a livelihood (pp.401).On the other hand, forbidding smoking in communal places will act as a way of providing justice to all non-smokers. Smoking sections commonly referred to as smoking zones ought to be established in workplaces and all public places. It is a secluded place where smokers go to have a puff leaving the non-smokers and the rest of the environment devoid of any form of pollution. In conclusion, whereas smokers possess their right to smoke, they should not be allowed to put the life of others in danger. Therefore Smoking in office buildings and public areas must be banned for the reason that of the risks associated with passive smoke in addition to the mess found in all smoking areas. It is a high time that the society considers the human rights of not only smokers, but non-smokers as well.